#2.070: Boobsalot

9 Comments

1. JoxMonster
   Posted January 17, 2013 at 2:13 AM | Permalink

   I’m just laughing at the well-meaning hypocrisy of Andie calling someone else “Boobsalot”!
   Even Mary Elizabeth is practically a B-cup next to her!

      0 likes

   Reply
2. BlueGriffin
   Posted January 17, 2013 at 1:24 AM | Permalink

   When I read the last panel:

   “Bum, Bum, BA!” Everyone looks at the sherif in a dramatic way.

      0 likes

   Reply
3. Lazy J
   Posted January 16, 2013 at 9:07 PM | Permalink

   do not like mr.sheriff there

      1 likes

   Reply
4. AsimovSideburns
   Posted January 16, 2013 at 12:45 AM | Permalink

   “Well, actually, she’d be tried by a jury of her peers. I guess you can be the ‘Investigator’ if you want to.”

      6 likes

   Reply
   • fishamaphone
     Posted January 16, 2013 at 2:09 AM | Permalink

     I’m always worried about the effects that typos can have on law. For example, what would happen if PETA was suddenly, as a result of an error in some legal document, the People for the Ethnical Treatment of Animals?

     In this case what concerns me is the possibility that Mary Elizabeth will be tried by a jury or piers. Docking ports which accept cargo are known to go for the death sentence.

        6 likes

     Reply
     • Bugle
       Posted January 16, 2013 at 2:29 AM | Permalink

       In that case they’ll just need to disguise her as a very tiny ship!

          0 likes

       Reply
       • SrPilha
         Posted January 16, 2013 at 4:35 AM | Permalink

         Her face can already launch a thousand ships, she should be fine.

         Not to mention that being judged by jury of boobsalots MUST have some up-sides.

            2 likes

         Reply
         • Devin J
           Posted January 16, 2013 at 5:39 AM | Permalink

           I would very much like to go to that trial, whether to see Mary Elizabeth be judged by piers or boobsalots.

              3 likes

     • EdorFaus
       Posted January 16, 2013 at 11:37 PM | Permalink

       I think I’d be more worried if it had the typo (I assume) you just did – if it said a jury OR peers instead of a jury OF peers – as that would probably be easier for a malicious lawyer to argue about, saying it can be a jury of non-peers (or a non-jury of peers, depending on which would benefit the lawyer most), as piers is much more obviously a typo/absurd and thus (I assume) easier to dismiss.

          0 likes

       Reply